Kitimat votes to supress Canada's future prosperity

valve37
Community Member

KITIMAT, B.C. -- The residents of Kitimat, B.C. have voted against the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline project in a non-binding plebiscite.

The ballot count from Saturday's vote was 1,793 opposed versus 1,278 who supported the multi-billion dollar project -- a margin of 58.4 per cent to 41.6 per cent.

The results from two polling stations and an advance vote all showed a clear majority for the "No" side.

 

"The people have spoken. That's what we wanted -- it's a democratic process," Kitimat Mayor Joanne Monaghan said in a statement issued after the vote Saturday night.

"We'll be talking about this Monday night at Council, and then we'll go from there with whatever Council decides," the statement said.

The $6.5-billion project would see two pipelines, one carrying oilsands' bitumen from Alberta to Kitimat's port, and a second carrying condensate -- a form of natural gas used to dilute the bitumen -- from Kitimat back to Alberta.

Kitimat would also be the site of a proposed two-berth marine terminal and tank farm to store the thick Alberta crude before it's loaded onto tankers for shipment to Asia.

Until this vote, Kitimat had remained neutral in its opinion on the controversial project. It didn't take part in the joint-review process, which heard from hundreds of people before a federal panel approved the project with 209 conditions.

The federal cabinet is expected to release its decision on Northern Gateway by June.

Northern Gateway's campaign has concentrated on the promise of 180 permanent, direct, local jobs worth $17 million, and more spinoff jobs for contractors and suppliers.

Calgary based Enbridge, the company behind Northern Gateway, has emphasized its commitment to safety and the environment, saying the National Energy Board Joint Review Panel, which held two years of hearings on the project, had made many of the company's voluntary commitments a mandatory part of the conditions for approval.

"As a long time-resident of northwestern B.C., I passionately believe that Northern Gateway is the right choice for Kitimat and for the future of our community," Donny van Dyk, Northern Gateway's Kitimat-based Manager of Coastal Aboriginal and Community Relations, said in a statement issued after Saturday's vote.

"Over the coming weeks and months we will continue to reach out and listen to our neighbours and friends so that Northern Gateway can build a lasting legacy for the people of our community."

The project's main opponent, the local environmental group Douglas Channel Watch, maintains the risk from either a tanker accident or a pipeline breach is too high for the small number of jobs the pipeline would bring to the community.

The plebiscite had also raised tensions between the District of Kitimat and the nearby Haisla First Nation, which is adamantly opposed to Northern Gateway.

Many Haisla were not allowed to vote because Kitamaat Village, a federal Indian reserve, is outside the municipal boundaries.

In a letter to local media, Haisla Chief Coun. Ellis Ross had called the decision to hold a vote at this late date a "slap in the face" for all the work done by the Haisla on the project.

A demonstration by members of the Haisla Nation at Kitimat's City Centre Mall quickly turned into a celebration after the vote results were announced. The Haisla Spirit of Kitlope Dancers led the celebration with drumming, singing and dancing.

Some Kitimat residents also joined the party, as did Nathan Cullen, the NDP Member of Parliament for Skeena Bulkley Valley.

Cullen, who has been a harsh critic of the project, said Saturday's vote sends a clear message that Stephen Harper's government must listen to.

"This is a resounding no to the Conservative policies. This is one of the most powerful grass roots things I have ever been associated with. This is good politics," he said.

Gerald Amos, an environmentalist and former member of the Haisla Nation Council, said, "The town of Kitimat has rejected a project that is not good for our economy. It endangers everything we worked for as a people here in Kitimat for the last ten thousand years."

A key reason for holding the vote was to fulfil a 2011 promise made by all municipal election candidates in Kitimat to poll citizens on the pipeline project.

But other than gauging public reaction to the proposed pipeline, it remains unclear -- even to Kitimat council -- what the non-binding vote will mean.

Even the plebiscite question, as chosen by the District of Kitimat council, was controversial, because it focused on the 209 conditions placed on the project by the Joint Review Panel: "Do you support the final report recommendations of the Joint Review Panel (JRP) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and National Energy Board, that the Enbridge Northern Gateway project be approved, subject to 209 conditions set out in Volume 2 of the JRP's final report?"

 

http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/kitimat-residents-vote-no-on-northern-gateway-1.1772969

"It came to me that every time I lose a dog they take a piece of my heart with them. And every new dog who comes into my life gifts me with a piece of their heart. If I live long enough, all the components of my heart will be dog, and I will become as generous and loving as they are."--Unknown
Message 1 of 10
latest reply
9 REPLIES 9

Kitimat votes to supress Canada's future prosperity

Canada's future prosperity? We can have prosperity for everyone without that pipeline.

Personally, I would like to thank the people of Kitimat for not bending over, to the oil companies and big business.





Photobucket
Message 2 of 10
latest reply

Kitimat votes to supress Canada's future prosperity

More and more railway tank cars will have to do the Kitimat job I suppose Prior. Hopefully Keystone will get approved and limit the tank cars going south. Of course the antis don't want either but they still want an equal division of oil revenue. An accident by rail can be more catastrophic than a ruptured pipeline. Seen that one in Lac-Megantic QC.    

"It came to me that every time I lose a dog they take a piece of my heart with them. And every new dog who comes into my life gifts me with a piece of their heart. If I live long enough, all the components of my heart will be dog, and I will become as generous and loving as they are."--Unknown
Message 3 of 10
latest reply

Kitimat votes to supress Canada's future prosperity

If you look up the number of tank car accidents with oil in North America, compared to pipeline leaks, you will find that there are far more pipeline problems. Also tankers can be made far more safer, it just takes legislation and the will to do so. Quebec was a rare occurrence compounded by other problems that should never have happened.





Photobucket
Message 4 of 10
latest reply

Kitimat votes to supress Canada's future prosperity

Spoiler
 

If you compare pipelines to tankers you will see that there are far more accidents per million gallons with tank cars than with pipelines.

Message 5 of 10
latest reply

Kitimat votes to supress Canada's future prosperity

Good, part of the bigger plan to cripple canada.

No longer will we be pushed aside.

 

Suppression???? I have 3 residential school survivor elders in the room with me as I type this. All 3 abused by Jesuits. Must I define suppression? 

 

W1

Beware of muffin bakin cellulite packin hot flashin dogmatic fibbin braggard nana's
Message 6 of 10
latest reply

Kitimat votes to supress Canada's future prosperity

Dept of Transport data for 2002 to 2012 shows:

 

- 2.2 gallons of spillage per million gallons by rail, compared to 6.3 gallons per million by pipeline.

 

- Between 2002 to 2012 rail cars spilled 2,300 equivalent barrels of oil. However pipelines spilled 474,000 equivalent barrels of oil. In other words rail delivery was less than 1% of spillage compared to pipelines.

 

- 2002 to 2012 rail lines had 148 incidents of spillage. Pipelines had 1,785 incidents of spillage........that's 45 times the number or rail accidents.

 

- From a financial point of view rail can take oil to areas that are easier for distribution, where as pipelines are limited and everything after than costs more and that goes on your price at the gas station. Pipelines are just easier for oil companies and if they have to charge the customer more, they don't care.  

 





Photobucket
Message 7 of 10
latest reply

Kitimat votes to supress Canada's future prosperity

1,785 spills. Wow.

Thats a very concerning information.
Message 8 of 10
latest reply

Kitimat votes to supress Canada's future prosperity

On average there are spills every day in AB. Whether pipeline or other.

 

Also... Terrace and Prince Rupert, the only other cities of any size in the entire northwest coast of B.C. also rejected the project, I think both by simple vote of town council. Terrace was 5-2 I believe.

 

Rupert did a presentation for the public consultation and said that "pristine" is the only acceptable environmental condition for their future prosperity. So at that point it was kind of a no-brainer.

 

BTW valve, I wouldn't be too worried if I were you. We all know that Stephen Harper doesn't worry too much about votes unless they go the way he wants them to. (i.e. - like when the prairie wheat farmers voted to maintain the Canada Wheat Board and Harper nuked it anyway)

 

 

Message 9 of 10
latest reply

Kitimat votes to supress Canada's future prosperity

"This party will not take its position based on public opinion polls. We will not take a stand based on focus groups. We will not take a stand based on phone-in shows or householder surveys or any other vagaries of pubic opinion"

- Stephen Harper

 

In short, Harper is not interested in anyone's opinion than his.





Photobucket
Message 10 of 10
latest reply