07-03-2013 02:29 AM
07-04-2013 10:40 AM
07-04-2013 10:42 AM
07-04-2013 10:58 AM
07-04-2013 02:58 PM
We also cannot use standard HTML emoticons.
But... We can UPLOAD them
(Have the original gif-files).
And copy / paste the uploads...
And RESIZE them
07-04-2013 11:55 PM
Oh bliss, one can "ignore" the silly, repeated, lengthy, boring signatures that are often more interesting than the post content!
07-05-2013 03:08 PM - edited 07-05-2013 03:08 PM
07-05-2013 03:19 PM - edited 07-05-2013 03:20 PM
The UK boards are going to be down next week and then we'll be using the same platform as you folks so we'll have a few things to get used to.
At present, we have to jump through hoops to post pics, animated gifs and our own saved smilies so we don't have to use the awful ones we've been "given".
Just testing a few:-
It's life Jim, but not as WE know it.
07-05-2013 03:40 PM
Doesn't the "Board Rule" apply over here that images used in sigs must be no bigger than 50 pixels by 220 pixels and must be static?
Yes, cee-dee, same rules... 50x220 pixels size-limit...
Must be static, except in board communities where they're accepted and welcomed...
As I've read HERE:
The Ziggys are not my "siggy"
This >>> "◄◄ ►► ■ ► ‖ ● " is...
07-05-2013 03:59 PM
07-05-2013 04:48 PM
Hi, yes, I knew they weren't a sig but I've seen others which are oversize and just wondered.
I'm also wondering what size pics can be posted on the new platform. I'll try one:-
"800 pixels wide" appears to be the unoffical limit for in-post picts...
(Might actully be somewhat higher, like 1000px to 1200px wide).
BTW, cool photo...
Now I'll try one... 1234px wide TEST:
(Used resize "handles" to fit pict to Reply form window)
07-05-2013 04:55 PM
And another, wide-angle version, 1234px wide image-test, without resizing width to fit Reply form window: