Skip to main content
Popular products
No suggestions.

Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval

Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval

(14 Replies / 139 Views)
Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 9, 2012 08:14 PM

Parks Canada’s stamp of approval for a multimillion dollar observation deck in Jasper National Park has sparked a debate if the country’s national parks are headed on a slippery slope towards privatization.

The Glacier Discovery Walk, the brainchild of an American-based tourism company, was cleared by Parks Canada on its environmental assessment on Thursday, much to the shock of various environmental groups who say a “tourist gimmicky trap” has no place in a national park.

“This is meant to signal to genuine advocates of the park that this government intends to pursue private profit at the expense of park principles,” said Jim Pissot of the Canmore, Alberta-based WildCanada Conservation Alliance. “They fled to Ottawa because they didn’t want to receive the outrage of Western Albertans who actually use the park.”

This isn’t the first time that private companies have worked in Canada’s national parks, but the Glacier Discovery Walkway has become the most visible example of this recent phenomenon.

Brewster Travel Canada, which is behind the project, won’t disclose how much construction will cost but Parks Canada estimates roughly 8 to 12 million.

The interpretative trail is imagined as 400-metre trail leading to a glass-floored observation platform that juts out 30 metres and 280 metres high. The facility would sit 6.5 kilometres up Alberta’s Icefields Parkway along the melting Athabasca Glacier. Brewster plans to charge somewhere between $15 to $29 for visitors to access the interpretative trail and estimates that visitation to the Glacier deck would jump 219 per cent to 262,987.

That federal environment minister Peter Kent took the unusual step of making the announcement in Ottawa instead of local park superintendent just further cemented the fact the project was under political pressure to be approved, critics charged.

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said she was surprised at the result of the environmental assessment (which hasn’t yet been made available to the public and was delayed for several weeks), given the large volume of complaints Parks Canada has received.

“This sets a really dangerous precedent for our national parks,” Ms. May said, adding she was “convinced the pressure came from much higher than Peter Kent.”

Mr. Kent, however, flatly denied the Conservative government had any pre-conceived agenda for the park and said the environmental assessment was robust and thorough.

“As with all things in the protection and conservation of our natural spaces, we balance that protection for future generations with reasonable access for Canadians,” Mr. Kent said. He denied this signaled an increasingly privatization of national parks, adding each future project would be evaluated on its individual merits.

 

Despite the minister and Brewster’s assurances the plan will be viable, Parks Canada staff have quietly expressed their concerns about the success of similar projects in other national parks. A 2009 staff letter, which Mr. Pissot obtained from Parks Canada under the Access to Information Act, outlines the virtual lack of support from the public for new recreational activities in the neighbouring Banff National Park.

“It does seem that people are looking this place as being defined by its wildlife and nature, its alpine beauty, its mountain culture and its wilderness adventure -- and worrying that we could be drifting from those elements,” wrote Kevin Van Tighem, the then superintendent of Banff, , oft heralded as crown jewel of Canada’s park system.

“If that is the case, then further confusing our brand identity with things that people don’t associate with their concept of a park experience could cost us further loss of market, not gain us increased market share,” Mr. Tighem stated.

Mr. Tighem told the Globe that the response he saw back in 2009 was that visitors wanted the national parks to have an ecological and educational component.

To that end, Brewster says the interpretative walkway will sit on a pre-existing parking lot, with minimal environmental impact.

 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/controversial-glacier-project-in-jasper-national-park-wins-approval/article2332254/


“I have decided to stick to love...Hate is too great a burden to bear.” ― Martin Luther King Jr.

Last Post
by art-in-the-making (1545 ) View Listings
(1 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 9, 2012 11:06 PM

As if a Canadian couldn't have come up with this idea, for starters.

 

Secondly, I agree that it is gimmicky and not appropriate for a national park.

 

Another thing this kinda reminds me of is what I heard recently, that it will be illegal to take photos of Trafalgar Square for any commercial purpose whatsoever, with a licence or permission. Probably connected with the Olympics coming up. Something similar was tried in U.S. national parks a number of years ago and scrapped.

 

 

WE don't need hucksters to come in and turn some of the most beautiful pristine wilderness in the world into carnyland.

 

What we need businesses to do is come up with truly innovative, original and powerful concepts to attract tourists and keep Canadian tourists in Canada.

 

 

 

 

(2 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 9, 2012 11:07 PM

that should be "without" a licence

(3 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 12:20 AM

The media attention this has been getting (was discussed on CBC radio the other day) may very well increase visitor travel to Jasper.  I think of the beautiful Visitor Interpretation Centre (whatever it is called) in Algonquin Provincial Park, and there is no way it can be described as "gimmicky" or "carneyland" Ditto for the Logging Museum located near the Park's East Gate.

 

If visitors don't want to pay extra to go on this new trail & platform, nobody is forcing them to do so, and I disagree with Ms May's statement that  "This sets a really dangerous precedent for our national parks"   Dangerous?  I think handing out matches and lighter fluid to make campfires would be far more dangerous.

 

The fact that an American-based tourism company (as opposed to a Canadian one) came up with this idea is what it is.  They were the first to plant a flag on the moon also.  The rules of the game never stated that only Made in Canada proposals would be entertained.  Mebbe there were no rules to this game, and there ought to have been.

Reading about the whole process undertaken to build the Vietnam Veteran's Memorial in Washington D.C. is very interesting.  Entry Number 1026 was chosen.  An undergraduate student named Maya Ying Lin designed it.  Her parents came to America in 1949 from China.  What this has to do with Jasper's observation deck I dunno, but I thought I'd throw it into my post before going to bed.


Someone's sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago. "Warren Buffett"

(4 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 01:36 AM

If visitors don't want to pay extra to go on this new trail & platform, nobody is forcing them to do so, and I disagree with Ms May's statement that  "This sets a really dangerous precedent for our national parks"

 

The precedent is incredibly bad and very dangerous. It's not only the continued encroachment within our national parks by commerical endevours (and Banf is a major problem IMO), it's also the barring of elements of this park to those who cannot or will not pay additional funds to enjoy what belongs to all of us!

 

I am continually floored by the attitudes of politicians who believe it their right to do what they want with my Canada.

 

Parks are created for two key reasons: to provide an area where we can enjoy the outdoors, and to preserve areas that are considered sensitive and in need of preservation.  By allowing this type of defacement to take place, we are abusing the latter in an area/park that is sensitive.

 

Bad move.

(5 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 07:17 AM

Let the promoters set up shop on their own dime, not riding the coattails of historical preservation efforts.

 

Jasper is already a world-class tourist attraction.

 

Probably the only reason Canadians didn't think of setting up some kind of tourist trap in Jasper is that no one thought in a million years it would be allowed.

 

As if there aren't hundreds of potential providers for such a service in B.C. and Alberta.

 

The other thing I would be concerned about (and I haven't looked into the plans for this project) is that the development would impede the enjoyment of the park by visitors who are not interested in paying extra for contrived "extras". In other words this thing will be right smack in the middle of where everyone wants to go, and you feel like a second-class citizen for not going there, all the kids all going to yell and scream they want to go there etc. - and that would make it carnyland.

 

I say let the tourism promoters go to work tapping into the untapped regions of imagination and richness of the country, so that they actually bring value to the table and aren't just siphoning off value that is already there. Keep them out of our national parks.

 

 

 

 

(6 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 08:30 AM

The other thing I would be concerned about (and I haven't looked into the plans for this project) is that the development would impede the enjoyment of the park by visitors who are not interested in paying extra for contrived "extras"

 

Impede the enjoyment?  The thing is being built mostly on the sight of an existing parking lot.  If I take my family to the CN Tower, (Something that has been many years) I don't feel any pressure to pay extra to dine in their revolving dining room, or extra $$  to go to a higher level than what the basic fare covers.  Ditto for Niagara Fall's Skylon Tower, or any place we go.  Do you think a Science Centre should have no gift shop?  No IMAX Theatre? 

 

As an optional "extra" the proposed Jasper interpretive trail/observation platform will have zero impact on thise who don't want to spend above and beyond. 

 

If the kids are yelling and screaming, they need to be taught to manage their expectations, and that is a life lesson that many parents themselves have never managed to accomplish.  But as a reason to prevent the building of this "extra" I think it falls far short. 

 

Elderly and mobility-impaired visitors will love this thing.  I bet it really increases tourist traffic, & overall Park revenue.  It will help promote Canada as a potential  tourist destination by showcasing some of the spectacular but easily accessible scenery the Park has to offer. 


Someone's sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago. "Warren Buffett"

(7 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 09:28 AM

Don't know why the antis should be concerned as according to Gorians and Suzukians glaciers are not going to be around much longer anyways. And so their rants would be better served concentrated somewhere else ............................... Artic ice?  


Money can't buy back your youth when you're old Or the loss of a loved one or a love that's grown cold Make one thing for certain when it comes your time You leave this old world with a satisfied mind

(8 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 10:52 AM

There is a lot more to this project. This is not some rustic gravel or stone covered path wandering quietly through the forest ending at a simple platform ……….noooo this is a hyper-modern walkway built on the side of the mountain taken from the design board of George Jetson’s offspring.

 

See artists sketches of the future project at the following links:

 

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/01/20/jesse-kline-theres-certainly-a-role-for-private-industry-in-jasper/

 

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Feds+approve+Jasper+glacier+walk/6126714/story.html

 

Shawn Cardiff, manager of land-use planning and policy for the park said “Jasper National Park is always looking for new ways to attract visitors”. My question is  a simple one…”why”? And we all know what the answer is ….$$$$. There are a million other ways to make money….leave the wilderness alone, leave the wildlife alone…..enough of it has been destroyed already thanks to a species who thinks it is the most intelligent on the planet, but the truth is….the more it invents…….. the more it upsets and destroys.

 

 

The whole idea of a wildlife area and conservation is to NOT intrude….NOT to change the environment and if it has to be done then it is done in the most minimal of ways. This is construction is NOT minimal.

Then there are the offshoots of a project like this:

a)     It will of course bring in more people and more people in themselves upsets the eco system. It’s like inviting a few thousand people a day into your backyard.

b)     A walkway like this will become a platform for trash. It may end up the largest Tim Horton cup collection site in Canada. The edges of the mountain are sheer…..who is going down there to pick up whatever thoughtless tourists and their children toss over the edge.

c)     At first after reading the basic article  I disagreed with May, until I seen the sketches put forth by the company. I see what she is getting at. No project like this stands on it’s own financially…ain’t happening….human greed will take over as it always does. First there will be the walkway and then the tourist area building selling souvenirs and then who knows what else…. and then the restaurant because people need to eat….. and then of course a large assortment of bathrooms unless they’re planning on sending people into the woods with a role of Charmin and snuggling up to a tree with a local bear (which wouldn’t be a bad idea because bears enjoy the occasional change in diet). Then they will find ways to extend this to a 12 month project in order to bring in more money and that will require more intrusion into what was suppose to be a ‘natural’ wildlife area. ‘Give them an inch and they’ll take a country mile’.

 

Areas like this should be left wild and pristine. If you want to walk through it….have a good time (along with rules and regulations). Disabled people who want to partake of nature….there are helicopters, hop in and enjoy the view.

 

I have to say valve……for a man who supposedly hunts and should have an understanding of nature and wildlife….your concepts are wayyyyy off base.  






Photobucket

(9 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 11:06 AM

Thanks for the post prior. The National Post, as usual, attempting to influence news rather than report it.

 

It doesn't look like it's in a parking lot.

 

"An interpretative trail, which will charge a reasonable fee of $15-$30"

 

:^O

 

The annual family pass for all the Quebec Provincial Parks is $70. That is a reasonable fee.

 

once you are in a national park, the reasonable fee for walking an interpretive trail is $0.00

 

 

(10 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 11:14 AM

If visitors don't want to pay extra to go on this new trail & platform, nobody is forcing them to do so

 

No, but they will have to look at it, whether they want to or not.  Nature is beautiful as it is.  We don't need enhancements by man to "improve" upon it. 


“I have decided to stick to love...Hate is too great a burden to bear.” ― Martin Luther King Jr.

(11 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 11:19 AM

Why don't they install this thing at the tar sands and let the National Post promote it like there's no tomorrow.

 

That would be innovative.

(12 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 12:37 PM

Why don't they install this thing at the tar sands and let the National Post promote it like there's no tomorrow.

 

That would be innovative.

 

they could install it over tailings ponds ... watch the duckies drown in oil while you walk!


"Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power"

Benito Mussolini

(13 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 01:05 PM

Why don't they install this thing at the tar sands

 

Ten points and a free game to art. That!..........was a good one!!!! Thanks for the best laugh I've had all day!!






Photobucket

(14 of 14)
Re: Controversial glacier project in Jasper National Park wins approval
Feb 10, 2012 06:46 PM

Thanks! I'll save up the 10 points in case someone puts on a tour of empty factories in eastern Canada.

 

Interesting - the comments in the Edmonton Journal are running heavily opposed to the walkway

To the top