12-31-2012 10:19 AM
In an attempt to seize total control over national security and bypass congress, a frightening new step by the Obama Administration is coming into play. As noted in Friday’s Wall Street Journal in an op-ed by John Bolton and John Woo, a State Department advisory group that is run by former Secretary of Defense William Perry is advising that the U.S. and Russia both reduce nuclear weapons without a treaty, as a treaty would require ratification by Congress. This would allow Obama and his executive branch to unilaterally cut our nuclear weaponry and ignore the treaty clause of the Constitution.
As Bolton and Woo point out, the US has a greater global responsibility than Russia; Iran and North Korea, neither of which is far from Russian interests, can only be countered by U.S. military strength. In addition, they note that Russia is not a trustworthy partner in weapons reduction; it has violated many arms-control agreements, such as the 1991 Presidential Nuclear Initiatives.
Some of the inherent problems in the seizure by this executive branch of decision-making power is Barack Obama’s desire to deeply cut our nuclear forces. A joint decision with Russia would place long-term limits on our cache of arms, thus placing constraints on us catching up if Russia decides to go ahead and build and the blurring of the lines deliberately drawn by the Constitution’s Framers separating the executive and legislative branches power.
Obama has made no secret of his desire to dismantle our nuclear capacity; the New Start Treaty he championed in 2011 forced the U.S. to observe a ceiling of 700 strategic delivery vehicles and 1,550 strategic warheads, and this past March he stated his desire to cut our arsenal further:
“ … a step we have never taken before – reducing not only our strategic nuclear warheads but also tactical weapons and warheads in reserve.”
It is naïve to assume that Obama is simply blind to the results of his actions and trusts the world around him to act with generosity. There has been too much evidence of Russia’s support of Iran’s nuclear weapons program, and Russia has cunningly avoided supporting sanctions on North Korea for its rocket launches; in December, Georgy Toloraya, Director of Korean Research at the Institute of Economics, simply said:
"In Russia we believe that resolutions must be observed and UN decisions must be implemented. We think that North Korea has the right for space explorations but only after all the issues linked with the UN sanctions banning rocket launches with the use of ballistic technologies are settled. It is necessary to divide two aspects - we support the discussion of the rocket launch issue by the UN Security Council but we don’t think that this must automatically mean tougher sanctions against Pyongyang.”
Obama knows all this. His step-by-step evisceration of the United States is not confined to its economic system but its national defense as well.
12-31-2012 10:21 AM
"advising that the U.S. and Russia both reduce nuclear weapons without a treaty"
That is a good thing.
As we can all see, the US Congress is dysfunctional. Why bother with them? Let's disarm, be peaceful and forget the US Congress. 🙂
12-31-2012 11:30 AM
I think it is a good idea as well. But you know how these Americans are when you mess with their constitution.
Next thing you know, Obama will find a way to make an end run around the Second Amendment. Then, we might have another American Revolution.
12-31-2012 11:41 AM
12-31-2012 11:52 AM
he is trying to create peace in the world.
Now all he needs to do is change his stand on Israel.
Too bad he can't keep peace in his own party. According to CNN this morning, the Democrats cannot even come to a consensus amongst themselves on how to deal with the fiscal cliff.
12-31-2012 11:59 AM
Changing his stand on Israel is a very dangerous step. They and their friends have a Lot of influence in the US. They create a Lot of business for the military industrial complex. They are the eyes and ears for the CIA and the US military in the region. It’s become a ‘you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours’ situation. Would walking away from them after 60 years of welfare help with peace?……absolutely, without a doubt! First Obama has to lay the ground work by convincing the US people and getting their support.
12-31-2012 05:54 PM
Changing his stand on Israel is a very dangerous step. They and their friends have a Lot of influence in the US. They create a Lot of business for the military industrial complex. They are the eyes and ears for the CIA and the US military in the region. It’s become a ‘you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours’ situation. Would walking away from them after 60 years of welfare help with peace?……absolutely, without a doubt! First Obama has to lay the ground work by convincing the US people and getting their support.
Deploying US soldiers to 35 African countries will not get obama any support. This is to happen in January 2013.
123
12-31-2012 06:52 PM