Port strike looms as talks break down

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) A strike at container ports from Boston to Houston appears more likely after talks broke down Tuesday, leaving businesses worried about a crippling shutdown set to start in less than two weeks.


The strike involves 14,500 dock workers at all major ports along the East and Gulf Coasts and could cost the economy at least $1 billion a day, as it stops the flow of goods from clothing and toys to televisions and furniture. The ports also accept many materials crucial to keeping U.S. factories running, such as auto parts and heavy machinery.


Over half of the ocean cargo containers coming to and from the United States go through the East or Gulf Coast ports, according to the Journal of Commerce.


The dock workers are represented by the International Longshoremen's Association and are negotiating with the United States Maritime Alliance, which represents management at the ports, terminals and shipping lines. The dock workers union, which has not gone on strike since 1977, has vowed to walk out at 12:01 a.m. on Dec. 30.


A strike would also lead to temporary unemployment for tens of thousands of other workers who handle the freight, such as truckers, railroad and warehouse workers.


The management group said it had accepted a federal mediator's proposal for a contract extension. It said it offered pay raises to the dock workers that would increase the average hourly rate to over $55, or more than $110,000 a year.


The International Longshoremen's Association said management's statement inflates wages paid to its members. It said it was willing to grant an extension, but only if the key issue in the talks -- payments that its members get for each container they handle -- is taken off the table. Management wants to cap or roll back those per-container payments, known as royalties, while the union wants to keep the current formula in place.


The National Retail Federation wrote to President Obama late Tuesday asking that he use his powers under the Taft-Hartley Act to essentially keep the dock workers on the job and keep the two sides talking.


"The U.S. economy cannot afford to wait for a strike to occur before we see administration action," said Mathew Shay, president and CEO of the retail trade group. "Allowing a strike to occur for even one day could have a negative impact."


The Retail Industry Leaders Association, another trade group, has also expressed concern about a possible strike and urged presidential action. Its members include retailers such as Wal-Mart Stores, Target, Home Depot and Whole Foods and manufacturers like Energizer and VF (which makes North Face and Wrangler clothing).


Unions generally oppose the use of Taft-Hartley to end strikes and the Obama administration did not intervene during an eight day strike earlier this month that shut down the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, which handle more than a third of the nation's containerized cargo between them.


 


http://money.cnn.com/2012/12/19/news/economy/port-strike/index.html

Message 1 of 4
latest reply
3 REPLIES 3

Port strike looms as talks break down

It's not about jobs. It's not about safety. It's not about improving dockworkers' living standards. The looming, long-planned East and Gulf Coast port strikes are about protecting Big Labor's archaic work practices and corrupt waterfront rackets.


Are you ready for a fiscal cliff? The union bosses of an estimated 14,500 workers at 15 ports are preparing to send the economy plunging back into recession over productivity and efficiency rules changes. You read that right. Much more on that in a moment. But first, here's what's at stake.


The International Longshoremen's Association's (ILA) grip extends from Boston to Texas to Florida and all points across the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts. The New York-New Jersey ports — which handle cargo valued at $208 billion — could come to a standstill. National Retail Federation executive Jonathan Gold issued a desperate statement: "The last thing the economy needs right now is another strike, which would impact all international trade and commerce at the nation's East and Gulf Coast container ports. This is truly a 'container cliff' in the making."


Retailers have begged Big Labor-lovin' President Obama to intervene. Good luck with that. The cozy White House powwow with union bosses immediately after Election Day tells you all you need to know about which side Obama champions.


The United States Maritime Alliance (USMX), which represents 14 Atlantic and Gulf Coast ports, has been bracing for a union-spearheaded shutdown since the summer, when labor negotiations fell apart. The ILA's current contract expired on Sept. 30. Federal mediators granted a 90-day extension that ends on Dec. 29. ILA President Harold Daggett won a unanimous green light earlier this month to call a strike if industry leaders don't give in completely to the union's demands. According to my sources, despite overwhelming industry concessions on wages and benefits, port watchers view the likelihood of a strike at "probably 70 to 85 percent now."


Don't believe the union sob stories. ILA members are among the highest paid union workers in the country. Starting pay for dockworkers is $20 an hour, with a top straight-time pay rate of $32 an hour. Longevity and overtime bonuses are generous, with ILA members earning an average of more than $124,000 a year in wages and benefits.


The sticking points of the heated ILA-USMX talks are "container royalties" (a fee per ton of containerized cargo that carriers pay to ILA members) and "customs and practice." On the New York-New Jersey waterfront, union racketeers have turned archaic work rules into a corrupt system of patronage tied to organized crime. Reporter Carl Horowitz of the National Legal and Policy Center broke down the container royalty dispute this fall: "In 2011 these royalties amounted to $232 million or about $15,500 per worker at Atlantic and Gulf Coast ports. This arrangement was established in 1960 when New York Longshoremen sought to protect themselves against job losses resulting from the introduction of automated cargo container weighing. It's been a ticket for inefficiency."


In other words, it's a ridiculously outdated surcharge on business to cushion the blow of modernity to workers. Unions, of course, siphon off a large chunk of the royalties — more than $20 million last year alone, according to the Supply Chain Digest. The trade publication points out that "ILA workers receiving those hefty checks today have no real connection to the perceived threat from container traffic to manually loaded freight and handling work that started the whole program in the 1960s."


USMX hasn't even called for eliminating the outdated fees. It just wants to cap them. Under the industry's contract proposal, ILA's average hourly rate would increase to more than $55, including overtime and container royalty. Workers would still not be required to pay premiums on their health care plans like most private employers now require their workers to do.


But the union won't budge, and it is screaming bloody murder over attempts to rein in other inefficiencies.


The additional "customs and practice" that the ILA seeks to preserve are a recipe for corruption. Don't take industry's word for it. This was the conclusion this year of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor. Decades of favoritism, nepotism and Mafia-friendly hiring practices have bred inefficient and criminal conditions that benefit "a privileged few." The union protects no-show and no-work jobs, 24-hour paid work for 8-hour-a-day-or-less clerks, and unlimited paid vacation for shop stewards. ILA has demanded that multiple crane operators be paid for the work of a single operator. And the commission's hearings exposed ILA bosses tied to mobsters and family members being paid more than $400,000 a year for up to 27 hours a day.


Union bosses and their Occupy Wall Street henchmen will be ratcheting up their rhetoric about "greed" and "fat cats" as they move to ring in the New Year by bringing the American economy to its knees. Now you know the rest of the story.



http://news.yahoo.com/looming-port-strike-really-080000524.html

Message 2 of 4
latest reply

Port strike looms as talks break down

"And the commission's hearings exposed ILA bosses tied to mobsters and family members being paid more than $400,000 a year for up to 27 hours a day"



27 hours is like a day on Mars probably.  Anyway, this story on Union greed and corruption is par for the course, of course.

Message 3 of 4
latest reply

Port strike looms as talks break down

Lumping all unions together, makes it easier for the tunnel visioned.


 


One union, the ILA has a long history of corruption. Back in the days when organized crime was more powerful the ILA was their first target and the foundation for future endeavours. At this point the whole situation is so convoluted, it's hard to say without more information who the good and bad guys are.





Photobucket
Message 4 of 4
latest reply