@marnotom! wrote:@walker0017 wrote:So you are calling all those who have
posted on this site stating that the items they received had been
repackaged resulting in damage to their items liars? Other than your
visit which is starting to appear to be on...
@afantiques wrote:the same cannot be said for the Erlanger depot
especially concerning repackaging as everyone here has read. Everyone
here has read a lot of things that simply are not true. There is no
nonsense filter on the internet and peer review...
@afantiques wrote:the shoddy practices of repackaging items to reduce
weight and all the other antics done in Kentucky and have been commented
upon by numerous buyers on this forum. The main problem with this theory
of repackaging is that it makes no...
@afantiques wrote:They repackage items to be less protected. This
statement is nonsense, at the time they have the items they are also
responsible for their safe arrival. Reducing the chances of this would
be foolish. Certainly this is not done at th...
Your basic assumption is wrong.You seem to believe that tracking
benefits the buyer.It doesn't.The purpose of tracking is to protect the
seller against unwarranted claims of non-delivery.Does the buyer pay for
it? Yes.Does it benefit the buyer? No, e...