what is everyones opinion of this new format? I think it is awful

[dutchman48]

I find this very difficult to follow and read, no dates once you open a posting, and all confluted

[tcmsecretuseid]

Yep. That is horrible.

[icyfroth]

So far so good, I quite like it. Don't like the smileys much though they look a bit buggy. See if you can get the same ones that yahoo have pls ebay.

Hi tcm 🙂

I don't see the use in that "success" message either!

[lynngehringer]

Hi!  Just checking to see how the CA boards are working.

I do not see where we have the ability to center pictures.   I do not like the new emoticons either.

[lynngehringer]

This Success thing is dumb.  Our post should just show up with the other posts before it.

[lynngehringer]

❤️

[lynngehringer]

We also cannot use standard HTML emoticons.

[lynngehringer]

Okay, I had to make my siggie smaller to show the text.  Let's see if it worked.

[lynngehringer]

Success! 🙂

[sadiesshop615]

---

@lynngehringer wrote:

We also cannot use standard HTML emoticons.

---

But... We can UPLOAD them  

(Have the original gif-files).

And copy / paste the uploads... 

And RESIZE them

[monman12]

Just testing.

nɥºɾ

n

[monman12]

Oh bliss, one can  "ignore" the silly, repeated, lengthy, boring signatures that are often more interesting than the post content!

nɥºɾ

[lynngehringer]

Hey, I like siggies!

[sadiesshop615]

---

@lynngehringer wrote:

Hey, I like siggies!

---

I like ZIGGYS...

[cee-dee]

Doesn't the "Board Rule" apply over here that images used in sigs must be no bigger than 50 pixels by 220 pixels and must be static?

Just testing:-

[cee-dee]

The UK boards are going to be down next week and then we'll be using the same platform as you folks so we'll have a few things to get used to.

At present, we have to jump through hoops to post pics, animated gifs and our own saved smilies so we don't have to use the awful ones we've been "given".

Just testing a few:-

 

[sadiesshop615]

---

@cee-dee wrote:

Doesn't the "Board Rule" apply over here that images used in sigs must be no bigger than 50 pixels by 220 pixels and must be static?

Just testing:-

---

---

Yes, cee-dee, same rules... 50x220 pixels size-limit...

Must be static, except in board communities where they're accepted and welcomed...

As I've read HERE:

http://pages.ebay.ca/help/policies/everyone-boards.html

BTW,

The Ziggys are not my "siggy"

This >>> "◄◄ ►► ■ ► ‖ ● " is...

[cee-dee]

Hi, yes, I knew they weren't a sig but I've seen others which are oversize and just wondered.

I'm also wondering what size pics can be posted on the new platform. I'll try one:-

[sadiesshop615]

---

@cee-dee wrote:

Hi, yes, I knew they weren't a sig but I've seen others which are oversize and just wondered.

I'm also wondering what size pics can be posted on the new platform. I'll try one:-

---

"800 pixels wide" appears to be the unoffical limit for in-post picts...

(Might actully be somewhat higher, like 1000px to 1200px wide).

BTW, cool photo...

                           

Now I'll try one... 1234px wide TEST:

(Used resize "handles" to fit pict to Reply form window)

[sadiesshop615]

And another, wide-angle version, 1234px wide image-test, without resizing width to fit Reply form window:

[right-then-petal]