02-23-2013 07:13 PM
Toronto becomes Canada’s first ‘sanctuary’ for illegal immigrants
The City of Toronto has put out the proverbial welcome mat for its' tens of thousands of illegal immigrants.
On Thursday, City Council voted in favour of Motion CD 18.5 — the so-called 'access without fear' motion — making Toronto Canada's first city with a formal policy allowing undocumented migrants access to City services such as foodbanks and homeless shelters.
[ Related: Immigration Minister Jason Kenney defends the transformation of Canada’s immigration system ]
The rationale of the 'don't ask don't tell' style policy is that some undocumented immigrants are causing themselves harm because they don't access services out of fear of detention or deportation.
"I think this is a historic moment,” Councillor Joe Mihevc told reporters according to Now Toronto.
"We’re saying we are a ‘Sanctuary City,’ and that anyone who is in the City of Toronto will be able to access all the services that the City of Toronto offers.
"That’s the kind of city that we want. We want to open our arms to anyone who comes here. While they’re here, mi casa es su casa."
Specifically, the motion, which passed by vote of 37 to 3, requires senior City staff to review opportunities to improve access without fear with regard to all city funded initiatives. It also inclines Council to lobby their provincial and federal counterparts for more friendly policies in the same regard.
One of dissenters was Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong.
"We shouldn’t encourage [undocumented immigrants]. We shouldn’t help them. We should not facilitate them. They are an insult to every immigrant who plays by the rule to get into the country. They are an insult to every immigrant who is waiting to enter this country legally," he told the Toronto Star.
"It sends a message to the world that it is okay to break the law to come to Canada and it says that the City of Toronto is an accomplice to this lawbreaking."
In addition to Minnan-Wong's concerns, some analysts worry that the new rules will encourage illegal immigrants from across the country to descend upon the Greater Toronto Area.
02-27-2013 07:43 PM
canada has absolutely nothing to be proud of.
Damn! I was proud of some of our natives. Guess I am wrong again. According to you, I can't even be proud of them.
So everyone in Canada, except the natives are racist. But you, who paint everyonewith the same brush, are not?
Yes,until deemed otherwise. Just another shield we need to survive on these lands against the never ending colonialism
Its been several centuries and ongoing today where the governments and their funding puppets have been trying to wipe us out.
Survival at any cost
And natives dislike when any canadian states, OUR NATIVES.
We are not yours and belong to no one.
W1B-)
02-27-2013 07:54 PM
And the news media allows such bigotry. Very sad.
Have you ever complained about it?
There are laws against racial based hatred.
I have also read a number of native based online "newspapers" which are filled with hatred for whites. But, I guess you have no problem with that.
Check for yourself. Every big city newspaper. TV stations,radio stations.
Check their online versions. Coast to coast.
What law??maybe for the jews, natives nah!
Its really a sad state of affairs.
Absolutely nothing to be proud of.
Your not embarrased?
Well I am embarrased for you
W1B-)
02-27-2013 10:10 PM
Tried to find out how many actually vote after getting the vote. Couldn't find an answer, but:
First Nations right to vote granted 50 years ago
Fifty years ago, the Canadian government granted First Nations people the right to vote in federal elections without losing their treaty status.
The anniversary, however, brings mixed emotions for many of Canada's first people.
In March 1960, Prime Minister John Diefenbaker pushed the voting rights legislation through Parliament. It came into effect July 1 that year.
First Nations people were given a conditional right to vote status at the time of Confederation in 1867.
To do so, they had to give up their treaty rights and Indian status.
In 1948, a parliamentary committee recommended that all "status Indians" be given the vote, but rules weren't put in place until Diefenbaker's legislation 12 years later.
Diefenbaker later told CBC in a November 1971 documentary that he was determined to give First Nations people the vote.
"I felt it was so unjust that they didn't have the vote," Diefenbaker said in the The Tenth Decade.
"I brought it about as soon as I could after becoming prime minister."
Dene chief's feelings 'mixed'
Bill Erasmus, national chief of the Dene Nation in the Northwest Territories, told CBC News on Wednesday that he is cautious about applauding the anniversary.
Erasmus said Diefenbaker went ahead with something that fundamentally affected the nation-to-nation basis of treaties with the Crown, and he did it without any meaningful consultation with First Nations people.
"That's what the whole exercise was about. It was to make us Canadians, and we never had a discussion about that," Erasmus said.
"So yes, I think people want to participate in Canadian society, but they need to participate on conditions that they entered into with the Crown. So that's why my feelings are mixed on the question."
Erasmus said that, as a result of those mixed emotions, some First Nations people have decided not to exercise their right to vote.
But he said for many others, voting and participation in the political process are things now taken for granted.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2010/07/01/north-first-nations-right-to-vote-60-years.html
02-27-2013 10:19 PM
Your not embarrased?
No, there are a million things that happen in this country every day that I have no control over.
All I can say is that I have never made a racist comment about the natives in this country.
Surprised about the private school, etc. No. There are lots of successful natives. One of the first natives I knew in BC had a brother who was a judge. Most of the successful natives that I have known didn't wait for treaties to be honored. They succeeded because that was what they wanted in life. They earned their success with hard work, sweat and tears. These are the natives that I truly respect. They have had to work twice as hard for their success because they live in a world that is prejudiced against any native succeeding. So, their success is that much more impressive.
02-27-2013 10:25 PM
It seems that many natives don't vote:
Should First Nations be part of Canadian elections? 50 years after getting the
vote, debate rages on
It’s been just over half a century since First Nations gained the right to cast a ballot in Canadian federal elections back in 1960.
Back at the time of Confederation, members of First Nations were originally not recognized as Canadian citizens and therefore could not participate in federal elections without giving up their treaty rights and ‘Indian Status.’
That process — known as enfranchisement — meant individual Indians lost all legal claims to rights set forth in the treaties as well as certain federal ‘entitlements’ reserved for them under the Indian Act. In some cases, it even meant the enfranchised would be unable to return to their community.
And while some things have changed greatly in Aboriginal circles over these past five decades, the rate of electoral participation by First Nations individuals remains relatively low. The reasons for this election apathy are wide-ranging; from historical grievances to lack of interest or education in Canadian politics, to feelings of irrelevancy.
Then there is the matter of whether a First Nation person should even cast a ballot to begin with, a controversy as old as the gaining of the franchise itself.
Amidst this debate raging on between educators, traditionalists, policy analysts, First Nation leaders and youth, perhaps none have expressed themselves as forcefully or unequivocally on the subject as Dr. Taiaiake Alfred. A Kanien’kehaka professor at the University of Victoria in British Columbia, Alfred...
The idea of leaders and intellectuals promoting political energy and activism into a political party in the Canadian electoral system is harmful, according to Alfred. He says First Nation leaders need to promote the idea of nationhood instead: “They talk about it all the time, and yet they are massive hypocrites by getting involved in electoral politics.”
Though he claims he doesn’t begrudge anyone who may cast a ballot on May 2, he says they may be disillusioned when comes to Indigenous nationhood. “If you’re a Canadian, you’re a Canadian, but don’t come back after the election and start talking about Anishinabe or Mohawk or Cree nationhood,” Alfred asserts. “Go all the way with it, and don’t be a hypocrite.”
For Alfred, First Nations individuals needs to choose between one or the other. “Or else,” he says, “the water will become very muddy. What are we then, when we are mixed up with everybody else?”
On the other side of the spectrum is Joseph Quesnel. He’s a Metis policy analyst with the
Frontier Centre for Public Policy, an independent, western Canadian based “think tank.”
“Someone can hold the belief that a community is important to one’s identity, but I also believe that you can have dual identities within Canada,” he says. “We can have provincial identities and we can also have national identities.”
According to Quesnel, First Nations need to stop perceiving the Canadian state as a ‘white man’s system.’ He says things would change if these attitudes were not present and might see greater political engagement by First Nations as a result. Quoting the ancient Greek philosopher Pericles, Quesnel says “just because you don’t take an interest in politics, doesn’t mean politics will take an interest in you. You become part of someone else’s design for political life.” He adds that if First Nations people want a say in the decisions that affect them, they should go out and vote.
Research shows that in some areas First Nation voters could potentially hold incredible influence in federal ridings, in turn affecting the outcome of elections — if only they casted ballots.
“If you have a couple of reserves in your riding, that’s going to influence things,” says Quesnel. “But in those ridings, voter turnout is lowest because of those same reserves. I don’t see how [voting] could do any harm. It could only change the political strategies and [then] they can’t take Aboriginal people for granted,” he suggested.
“If I weren’t to [vote], then it would be a lot harder for them to care about what I had to say,” remarks Genaille. “I think if Indigenous peoples were to get out and vote by mass we would be paid attention to.”
And while he is aware of the possible stigma attached to First Nations voters from those who would regard them as assimilated or ‘selling out’ when taking part in elections, he is ultimately not convinced by their arguments: “We explain to our youth that we can resist the system by not participating in it, but that doesn’t benefit us in any way. Instead, it allows us to be invisible.”
Try telling that to Winnipeg’s Donna Moose. A Cree mother/grandmother of five, she’s only voted once and questions whether casting a ballot makes any difference whatsoever: “I think topics the candidates talk about, debate, and promise have no impact or effect on my life.”
Growing up in the city’s north end, Moose says she received little education about Canadian politics. However, she says if she saw more Aboriginal candidates running, she might feel more inclined to participate.
Working to convince people like Moose to do just that is the
Clearly, it will require some effort to get those issues on the radar. With less than three weeks to go before the federal election, the party leaders and their candidates have so far been largely silent on First Nations issues. Meantime, a half-century after they gained the right to vote, it remains to be seen whether Aboriginal voters will ever become an actively mobilized force at the ballot box.
02-27-2013 11:12 PM