04-10-2018 02:29 PM
Hi, all. In case you missed it, the most recent Seller News article talks about how the product-based shopping experience categories will be expanding in the future, with details to be provided in the May 2018 Seller Update.
Please use this thread for any questions or comments you might have on this topic. We may have a special guest in store who can answer some of your questions
04-10-2018 02:56 PM
Thanks for setting up the thread, happy_pigeon!
Hello Canadian eBayers! It's been a while 🙂
As happy_pigeon mentioned, I'm here as a special guest this week to help you with any questions around the new listing requirements as eBay transitions to a product-based shopping experience. I'll do my best to come to the thread often and address everyone's questions and concerns as best as I can, but please bear with me if I don't get to your question right away.
Looking forward to catch up and discuss the new product-based shopping experience!
04-10-2018 06:05 PM
Good afternoon, Raphael. It's nice to hear form you again.
I have serious misgivings about the Product-based search as the new pages do not include any of my items even where there is a match to the Product. As you may know, I don't have access to most of the ebay.com catalogue when listing on ebay.ca and, therefore, my items show nowhere when Results are Grouped.
It's reached the point where I can pretty much tell when the team is testing those Grouped results in my areas of items because I will go from heavy sales to no sales whatsoever with nothing in between. This is abnormal for me.
What assurances can you offer that ebay Canada sellers won't continue to be left in the cold like this?
04-10-2018 06:26 PM
What most will likely want to know is how items which do not readily conform to UPC/MPN formats are going to be treated given that there are categories where that consist of items that fall on either side of that equation.
From a look at the phase 1 product lines it looks like the emphasis is more on brands than it is categories or products. Should we expect the same as this rolls forward?
"Throughout 2018 and 2019, we will expand the eBay catalogue in phases—and provide you will sufficient advance notice and tools to help you list with the catalogue efficiently and effectively. With each phase, we'll invite you to contribute your expertise and suggest edits to improve the catalogue and help ensure that products in the catalogue are accurate and up-to-date."
What could possibly go wrong there? Crikey.
04-10-2018 08:10 PM
So those of us old timers selling eclectic pre owned/collectible items are going to just fade away. I've been selling here for more than 15 years, and lately, (since the beginning January 2018, I'm lucky to sell one maybe two items/month. If ebay would make an executive decision and simple announce that we are no longer welcome here, rather than keep stringing us along, with one promotion after the other.
When it is suggested that the collectible buyer is not there anymore, that's not so. Instead of sending us sellers into oblivion, take advantage of the current trend of re-use, re-cycle and re -invent. Go to any antique/flea market fair, and watch people buy anything NOT made in China.
Remember why and how ebay originated. Someone in the corner office, seem to have issues with anything pre owned.
Well, that was my 2 cents worth. I feel with my length of time as a seller, I have the right to voice an opinion.
04-10-2018 08:24 PM
@momcqueen wrote:
Good afternoon, Raphael. It's nice to hear form you again.
I have serious misgivings about the Product-based search as the new pages do not include any of my items even where there is a match to the Product. As you may know, I don't have access to most of the ebay.com catalogue when listing on ebay.ca and, therefore, my items show nowhere when Results are Grouped.
It's reached the point where I can pretty much tell when the team is testing those Grouped results in my areas of items because I will go from heavy sales to no sales whatsoever with nothing in between. This is abnormal for me.
What assurances can you offer that ebay Canada sellers won't continue to be left in the cold like this?
Hi Maureen, nice to see you again 🙂
First off just to clarify, we aren't testing compressed search results at this moment. The option is there for buyers to use but there won't be any changes to the default search type until we turn that on for the specific products listed in the announcement from February. Based on that, and as counter-intuitive as this may sound, I doubt that fluctuations in your sales volume were due to the product based shopping experience.
With that said, I'd love to dive deeper to see for myself what you are experiencing. Could you email me at raphael@ebay.com (not a forum message please) and give me a few item numbers that presented problems when you tried to find them in compressed search? Please also include what keywords you used to search.
Thanks!
-R
04-10-2018 08:35 PM
@hlmacdon wrote:
What most will likely want to know is how items which do not readily conform to UPC/MPN formats are going to be treated given that there are categories where that consist of items that fall on either side of that equation.
From a look at the phase 1 product lines it looks like the emphasis is more on brands than it is categories or products. Should we expect the same as this rolls forward?
"Throughout 2018 and 2019, we will expand the eBay catalogue in phases—and provide you will sufficient advance notice and tools to help you list with the catalogue efficiently and effectively. With each phase, we'll invite you to contribute your expertise and suggest edits to improve the catalogue and help ensure that products in the catalogue are accurate and up-to-date."
What could possibly go wrong there? Crikey.
Hi hlmacdon,
This is a question that comes up a lot, as you may imagine. As you pointed out, we are starting off with the easier products. What we announced in February as a first step are product lines that we were confident that we could make "perfect" in the eBay catalogue, for example iPhones, which are pretty clear cut in terms of being able to ensure we have all existing models with all possible permutations and correct specs. From a shopping experience point of view, these are also highly "search-compressable", meaning we can confidently group listings into productized search results.
Soon, we will announce the next step in this transition, which will expand to categories that include product lines are still pretty clearly defined from a catalogue data standpoint. This will take us to the end of 2018. More details on this will come in the next Seller Update.
As we move to 2019 and beyond, we will start solving for less "search-compressable" categories and products and how those fit in the new product based shopping experience, up to and including the unique, OOAK items. We will announce the finer details for this in due time, but for now, if you're selling in any of the categories for this type of unique items (Collectibles for example), you don't have to worry about this and trust that we will give you ample notice before you need to do anything.
04-10-2018 08:39 PM
@pinetreecottage wrote:
So those of us old timers selling eclectic pre owned/collectible items are going to just fade away. I've been selling here for more than 15 years, and lately, (since the beginning January 2018, I'm lucky to sell one maybe two items/month. If ebay would make an executive decision and simple announce that we are no longer welcome here, rather than keep stringing us along, with one promotion after the other.
When it is suggested that the collectible buyer is not there anymore, that's not so. Instead of sending us sellers into oblivion, take advantage of the current trend of re-use, re-cycle and re -invent. Go to any antique/flea market fair, and watch people buy anything NOT made in China.
Remember why and how ebay originated. Someone in the corner office, seem to have issues with anything pre owned.
Well, that was my 2 cents worth. I feel with my length of time as a seller, I have the right to voice an opinion.
Hello pinetreecottage,
We are certainly not looking to lose the unique, one of a kind inventory and sellers like you who offer them. I'm saying this both for short term and long term. As I said earlier, we are currently solving for the commodity, widely available inventory because this is much easier to move to a product based marketplace. Later, we will start tackling more and more unique inventory and I assure you there will still be a place for pre-owned, collectible, hard to find items.
04-10-2018 09:04 PM
Thank you, Raphael. I will do that. Probably not until Thursday, though, as I've got some other irons in the fire which take priority but I will submit to you my findings.
May I also add how excited that I am to finally have access to Promotions Manager on ebay.ca starting Monday? I'm very, very excited. I can hardly wait.
I hope they're treating you well down south, and that you haven't been pining too hard for good old Canadian winters. It must be so touch to say goodbye to that. Hahaha.
05-02-2018 06:44 PM
Hello again,
My initial tests with the results shown under Grouped listings have excluded anything I list on ebay.ca from results shown on ebay.com even when those UPCs match. At what point will Product Categories supersede and transcend the site on which they were created? If they don't, as in if that is not at all the intent, there are implications for item visibility which will impact seller viability.
Threads:
https://community.ebay.ca/t5/Seller-Central/So-Many-Listings-with-No-Views/m-p/395231
Just one of the listings I used to run my experiments in search was this one. It didn't show on ebay.ca in Grouped Listings either but since ebay stopped running the Grouped option, I cannot re-create the results for you. https://www.ebay.ca/itm/Disney-PIXAR-Cars-FRANK-the-COMBINE-diecast-RADIATOR-SPRINGS-Theme-11-14-DEL... or item
05-03-2018 07:57 PM
@momcqueen wrote:
Hello again,
My initial tests with the results shown under Grouped listings have excluded anything I list on ebay.ca from results shown on ebay.com even when those UPCs match. At what point will Product Categories supersede and transcend the site on which they were created? If they don't, as in if that is not at all the intent, there are implications for item visibility which will impact seller viability.
Threads:
https://community.ebay.ca/t5/Seller-Central/So-Many-Listings-with-No-Views/m-p/395231
Just one of the listings I used to run my experiments in search was this one. It didn't show on ebay.ca in Grouped Listings either but since ebay stopped running the Grouped option, I cannot re-create the results for you. https://www.ebay.ca/itm/Disney-PIXAR-Cars-FRANK-the-COMBINE-diecast-RADIATOR-SPRINGS-Theme-11-14-DEL... or item
232682657870. Regardless of the listings I used, even when the UPC was valid and matched, I showed nowhere on either ebay.com or ebay.ca.Thanks,Maureen
Hi Maureen,
Can you specify exactly how you tested this? What was the search query you used on both sites? I would like to try for myself.
One thing I can say for now is that we haven't really worked on the Toys category yet, whether from a catalogue coverage and quality standpoint or in terms of grouped search results. Toys is part of the categories we are unlikely to tackle for the time being, and we will provide ample advance notice before we make any changes there or in any categories we haven't touched yet in the context of Product Based Shopping Experience. What this means is, until we announce anything relating to the Toys category, you don't have to worry about this because buyers will not be put into a grouped search experience. When we do get there, we will come in strong with learnings from the previous deployments and I'm confident you will see a much better experience.
Hope this helps!
-R
05-04-2018 06:53 AM
Thank you, Raphael. My search terms were, on both sites and in all cases that I can recall, 'Disney Cars Frank diecast' which as a buyer would be the terms I would use to find this product should I be searching to acquire new stock. I picked that particular character as my search test because he is one that is both in demand and (somewhat) readily available, although the counterfeited (cough, I mean 'tributes') from China were indexed as one would expect while mine were not. Also, Frank is not a character for whom a card in the Catalogue presents itself when listing, as is the case with 98 per cent of Cars, Cars are not part of the catalogue yet.
Again, my concern stems from being included and visible in normal search results to invisible in Grouped results which I notice are no longer offered as a filter choice at top right as they were for a time.
You might recall that all my Item Specifics were added to my listings in advance of that point in time when UPCs were beginning to be made mandatory. They have been integral to my listings since the initiative was announced.
I ran some similar tests using random LEGO minifigure characters and came to the same conclusion I had been similarly excluded so my theory is not that it is a flaw with the listing as much as it is something particular to me as a seller. Or the site from which the listings were created. I would offer that if you picked any of my listings with the correct Product Identifiers and tried to find them in a Grouped search on either site, you would achieve the same results as did I.
Complicating matters is that Canadians and Europeans often have completely different UPCs for the same product as do Americans. My items are sourced from both within Canada and The States so I carry a mix of the two. If you need assistance with that, let me know. With the toys that I carry, it affects Cars more than any other product line. In Canada, there is one UPC shared by virtually every character in the line (similar to Hot Wheels) but the differentiating factor is the MPN whereas the same character in an American package has its own unique UPC and MPN.
The Frank example I used above was an American-based Frank so it had its own UPC. Yet it did not display in either site when Grouped.
I had not yet experimented with international Cars who all share one UPC per line per manufacturing year before the option to search by Grouped disappeared again for the regular user. I cannot tell you how those products behave in Grouped searches.
05-04-2018 11:25 AM
@momcqueen wrote:
Thank you, Raphael. My search terms were, on both sites and in all cases that I can recall, 'Disney Cars Frank diecast' which as a buyer would be the terms I would use to find this product should I be searching to acquire new stock. I picked that particular character as my search test because he is one that is both in demand and (somewhat) readily available, although the counterfeited (cough, I mean 'tributes') from China were indexed as one would expect while mine were not. Also, Frank is not a character for whom a card in the Catalogue presents itself when listing, as is the case with 98 per cent of Cars, Cars are not part of the catalogue yet.
Again, my concern stems from being included and visible in normal search results to invisible in Grouped results which I notice are no longer offered as a filter choice at top right as they were for a time.
You might recall that all my Item Specifics were added to my listings in advance of that point in time when UPCs were beginning to be made mandatory. They have been integral to my listings since the initiative was announced.
I ran some similar tests using random LEGO minifigure characters and came to the same conclusion I had been similarly excluded so my theory is not that it is a flaw with the listing as much as it is something particular to me as a seller. Or the site from which the listings were created. I would offer that if you picked any of my listings with the correct Product Identifiers and tried to find them in a Grouped search on either site, you would achieve the same results as did I.
Complicating matters is that Canadians and Europeans often have completely different UPCs for the same product as do Americans. My items are sourced from both within Canada and The States so I carry a mix of the two. If you need assistance with that, let me know. With the toys that I carry, it affects Cars more than any other product line. In Canada, there is one UPC shared by virtually every character in the line (similar to Hot Wheels) but the differentiating factor is the MPN whereas the same character in an American package has its own unique UPC and MPN.
The Frank example I used above was an American-based Frank so it had its own UPC. Yet it did not display in either site when Grouped.
I had not yet experimented with international Cars who all share one UPC per line per manufacturing year before the option to search by Grouped disappeared again for the regular user. I cannot tell you how those products behave in Grouped searches.
Hi Maureen,
Thanks for the additional information. It is as I thought: You're not seeing your listings in grouped search yet because your listings aren't associated with any product in the eBay Catalogue. This is a hard requirement for inclusion in the product based search experience (PBSE). It's none of your fault either: as you point out, the specific items you are selling aren't in the catalogue yet. When we get to the deployment of PBSE in the Toys category, the story will be different as you will be able to find those in the catalog and match them to your listings, which will make your listings show in the PBSE experience.
Watch for our upcoming announcement, the next Seller Update will have a lot more information about what the future looks like with regards to how we will transition eBay from a listings based marketplace to a product based one, how the eBay catalogue will be enriched with a lot of products that aren't currently in, etc.
-R
05-04-2018 11:37 AM
So if I have translated the above message correctly, until the system catches up to itself, certain listings will/have become more difficult to locate. Would that be a variation of listing discrimination for a large quantity of current eBay sellers?
-CM
05-04-2018 11:42 AM - edited 05-04-2018 11:47 AM
raphael@ebay.com wrote:We are certainly not looking to lose the unique, one of a kind inventory and sellers like you who offer them. I'm saying this both for short term and long term. As I said earlier, we are currently solving for the commodity, widely available inventory because this is much easier to move to a product based marketplace. Later, we will start tackling more and more unique inventory and I assure you there will still be a place for pre-owned, collectible, hard to find items.
First, so good to see you here again!
Second, I have to agree with everything 'pinetreecottage' has said, being in almost exactly the same boat.
While I'm not specifically worried about the "product grouping" that will be taking place, what I am very concerned about, as a OOAK/vintage seller is the effect that items with UPCs are already apparently having on my visibility.
Let me explain what I've been seeing. I regularly sell what could be considered high-demand items in my category, in the $200-$300 US range. I still list these mostly on .com. Prior to a few months ago, if I listed one of these items it would almost always be high up on page 1 in search results. What has begun to occur recently is that Chinese sellers, with "sorta, kinda, wannabee" inexpensive, look-alike goods of inferior quality are listing in my category and monopolizing the first 2 or 3 pages of searches. What I suspect is that they've discovered that if they have UPC codes, they'll move up to the front of the line. They also use the ploy of listing very close, but not exactly duplicate items to multiply their visibility. These are not stellar eBay sellers, based on their FB history at least.
The only sellers who (quite understandably) manage to get ahead of this tsunami seem to be a handful of U.S. sellers who have US TRS and a perfect, or near-perfect, FB score. I've maintained top customer service, 100% FB, and 0 defects throughout my nearly 15 years on eBay. True, I've lost my TRS due to eBay's recent policy changes in this regard, and due to a lower sales volume in 2018, but does that merit page 3 or 4 visibility behind a bunch of hucksters? Yes, they are selling of course.
I worry about what "product-based" visibility will add to this already tenuous situation, and that buyers will no longer necessarily see the best, top-quality sellers first, since visibility will no longer be primarily merit-based.
On the other hand, I see desperate sellers in my categories who are now turning to selling digitally-delivered items in normal eBay categories (which I thought was verboten).
I would really like to know if you can tell us what eBay has in mind with regard to "grouping" OOAK/vintage items? And why, why, why, didn't eBay start up a specialty channel for such sellers (excluding, of course, the mountains of Chinese manufactured dross)? They could have given Betsy a run for her money. Has this never been considered?
All in all, I see a bleak future for me here, and I do think 2018 will be the end of my long selling career on eBay. EBay is now focused on the big and shiny. It's got to the point where it makes little difference how perfect I am or what I list. I'm not saying this with any rancour, just resignation. I feel it's better to prepare to accept the inevitable than to be gob-smacked.
05-04-2018 11:48 AM
05-04-2018 11:50 AM
"You're not seeing your listings in grouped search yet because your listings aren't associated with any product in the eBay Catalogue."
Okay, yes. Except other sellers and their products are being included in that Grouped item. What did they do that I did not? This is the nature of what concerns me, that I have been excluded. My item, the Frank that I cited, is an American product imported be me with an American UPC that matches the other American UPCs for the new items selling on ebay.com and those sellers and their items are included but me and mine are not.
05-04-2018 11:54 AM
i.e. Their items are matched with the Product Card in the catalogue for that particular item. But my identical item is not. The reason cannot be simply that there is no card for it, because the card appears. When that search was sorted as Grouped, there was data, there were items like it. Just not mine. Mine was excluded. Therefore it cannot be as simple as there is no card entry for the item, because I saw the card myself containing dozens and sometimes hundreds of other sellers' identical (or even less suitable) matches. This is the nature of my concern. As far as that Catalogue card is concerned, I could have written it because my data is extensive and correct. Yet excluded.
05-04-2018 12:46 PM
The part about this being a problem or issue for us as Canadian sellers does not seem to be sinking in to the powers that be. All I know with each one of these recent roll-outs, my traffic/watchers and sales have dropped and fairly confident its not because of something I have done. Making item visibility an extremely difficult obstacle course is not helping the situation.
-CM
05-04-2018 02:02 PM
@lotzofuniquegoodies wrote:
So if I have translated the above message correctly, until the system catches up to itself, certain listings will/have become more difficult to locate. Would that be a variation of listing discrimination for a large quantity of current eBay sellers?
-CM
Hi cerebralmonk,
I don't think your translation is accurate. What I said was, we are moving carefully through the transition from today's listing-centric marketplace to tomorrow's product-based experience. How we do that is by small increments, which allows us to figure things out as we go without breaking the business. In other words, when we turn on the new product based shopping experience for any specific products or in any category, it'll be after we gave sellers a chance to align with the new requirements and match their listings to the correct products in the eBay catalogue.
Maureen's tests are not accurate because her listings are in a category where this pre-work hasn't been done yet and where the buyers don't see the new experience, so when she goes in and tries to find her listings in the new experience, it is for that reason they aren't there. The silver lining is, buyers aren't shopping that way yet.
-R