Wynne's "cap and trade" first casualty

valve37
Community Member

She should have added to her grand children reference " This is about preserving a world for our children and our grandchildren,” plus "who won't have jobs". The effects of Wynne's cap and trade merely move the CO2 emissions to another part of the world and in this case US and Mexico.

 

Toyota moves Corolla to Mexico, highlighting high costs in Canada

 

Toyota Motor Corp. plans to shift production of Corolla compact cars from Cambridge, Ont., to a new factory in Mexico, ending an era that began when the company opened its first Canadian assembly plant in 1988.

Corolla production in Cambridge is expected to be replaced by other, larger vehicles when the auto maker’s first full-scale Mexican plant begins production 2019, said sources familiar with Toyota’s plans, which are scheduled to be announced Wednesday.

While employment levels at Toyota’s two Ontario plants are not expected to change, the shift underlines how Canada’s competitive position in vehicle manufacturing is eroding.

It’s a sign that almost 30 years after establishing manufacturing operations in Cambridge, Toyota no longer generates sufficient profit from manufacturing in Canada the bestselling vehicle in its Canadian lineup.

The company has assembled about 3.5 million Corolla models in Cambridge. Its first vehicle, a blue 1988 model, still adorns the lobby of the factory.

Costs are higher at Toyota’s assembly plants in Cambridge and Woodstock, Ont., than they are at its factories in Kentucky, Indiana and other U.S. states, so it makes sense to build more expensive vehicles at the Canadian operations, sources said.

A report done in 2013 for the Canadian Automotive Partnership Council, an industry labour group set up to advise the federal and Ontario governments, warned that assembly is moving to the Southern United States and Mexico because of higher logistics, labour and parts costs.

“At least one assembler with operations in both Canada and the U.S. South indicates that, on an annual basis, the costs of operating an assembly facility is significantly less in the U.S. South than in Canada,” the report said. That comparison was between costs in Cambridge and Toyota’s factory in Kentucky, sources have said.

The possibilities to replace Corolla include adding RAV4 production to Cambridge – that crossover is already assembled in Woodstock – and the larger Toyota Highlander crossover and possibly more Lexus models, sources said. The four-year horizon for building the Mexico plant also means Toyota could add new vehicles now on the drawing board or not developed yet.

About 3,000 of Toyota’s 5,600 employees in Cambridge assemble Corolla models. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc. also assembles the Lexus RX350 luxury crossover in the same factory. The vehicles share a body shop, but each has its own paint shop and final assembly line.

Toyota is relatively late to the party in Mexico, which landed $3.4-billion (U.S.) in investments in new assembly plants last year alone and now boasts a roster of auto makers that includes the largest Detroit-based, European, Japanese and South Korean companies and several luxury brands.

Reuters reported Tuesday that Toyota’s investment in Mexico will be $1-billion.

Toyota operates a plant in Baja, Mexico, that does final assembly of compact pickup trucks, but it has no established supply base in the country, unlike the parts producers that have been established around its other North American plants to supply components.

Because of that lack of suppliers, logistics costs will negate the low-cost advantages of locating in Mexico in the short term, said one senior industry source familiar with the company’s North American operations.

“So the return from Mexico is long-term, not shorter term,” the source said.

Separately, other wire service reports said on Tuesday that Ford Motor Co. will announce $2.5-billion in engine investments on Friday, including a project that the Ontario and federal governments tried and failed to land for Windsor, Ont.

 

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-business/toyota-moves-corolla-to-mex...

"It came to me that every time I lose a dog they take a piece of my heart with them. And every new dog who comes into my life gifts me with a piece of their heart. If I live long enough, all the components of my heart will be dog, and I will become as generous and loving as they are."--Unknown
Message 1 of 10
latest reply
9 REPLIES 9

Re: Wynne's "cap and trade" first casualty

There are better ways to reduce pollution.
You can start by removing the HST on products that energy efficient or low emisions.
Do that for a few years to increase demand to help manufacturers to increase production to lower cost to produce per unit on these products.
Message 2 of 10
latest reply

Re: Wynne's "cap and trade" first casualty

"removing the HST..."

 

That would require a federal initiative.  Considering his record in the last nine years, do you really expect Mr Harper to go that way?

 

On the other hand, removing the tax on equipment does not mean a thing as corporation already get 100% rebate on the tax (GST/HST) paid through ITCs (Input Tax Credits)

Message 3 of 10
latest reply

Re: Wynne's "cap and trade" first casualty

Pierre are you one of those people who feel the liberals can do no wrong and will defend them no matter what and attack Harper at the same time?

The province has the option of removing the 8% provincial portion of the HST regardless of what the federalis do.

 

Message 4 of 10
latest reply

Re: Wynne's "cap and trade" first casualty

" will defend them"

 

???

 

Who is defending them?

 

Your post suggests something (HST) that is controlled by law by the federal government.  Nothing to do with the provincial (regardless of party in power)

 

The other reality is that dropping the GST or HST or PST portion of the HST is totally meaningless as corporations pay ZERO HST or PST portion of HST.  All of it is refunded already as ITCs.

Message 5 of 10
latest reply

Re: Wynne's "cap and trade" first casualty

You drop the HST on the end purchaser of the product.

It encourages them to buy more producrs that are energy efficient or low emissions.

The manufacturer gets a higher demand and can take advantage of cost savings on larger production runs and bring down the cost which increases demands on these products.

Eventually the cost is similar to low energy efficient units or high emissions units which makes them appealing to the consumer.

 

Message 6 of 10
latest reply

Re: Wynne's "cap and trade" first casualty

"Considering his record in the last nine years"

 

Lurk, Pierre conveniently forgot or maybe it's old age, that the Feds cut the FST portion of the HST from 7 to 5 %.

 

The split income and TFSA additions are also tax saving goodies brought in by Team Harper. Hope he hasn't forgot about those and is taking advantage!

"It came to me that every time I lose a dog they take a piece of my heart with them. And every new dog who comes into my life gifts me with a piece of their heart. If I live long enough, all the components of my heart will be dog, and I will become as generous and loving as they are."--Unknown
Message 7 of 10
latest reply

Re: Wynne's "cap and trade" first casualty

I remember the liberals saying that they had a better way of reducing taxes when Harper lowered the rate on the GST, but I have yet to see a liberal government lower taxes. I've seen them raise taxes many times.\

Message 8 of 10
latest reply

Re: Wynne's "cap and trade" first casualty

"but I have yet to see a liberal government lower taxes. "

 

That may be because you have not looked.  Maybe you just assumed (and we all know the meaning of the word "assume").

 

After Chretien took power in 1993, the lowest federal tax rate was 17% (1994)

 

By the time Martin left in 2006, the lowest federal tax rate had been lowered to 15.25%

 

That is a decrease of 1.75%

 

Fast forward to 2014 under Harper and the lowest federal tax rate is now 15%

 

That is a decrease of 0.25%

 

It is worth remembering that the Liberals ran a budget surplus year after year, despite some recession periods.  We all know the Conservatives have been running huge - record - deficits for the last six consecutive years and increased the national debt in the process by tens of billions of dollars that will have to be repaid by our children and grandchildren eventually (the liberals had lowered the national debt in their last nine years!).

 

Now when you take a look at the highest tax rate, they have not changed under the Liberals nor the Conservatives.  What has changed is much lower tax rate for banks and corporations.  Also high income Canadians now get more tax breaks than they had under the liberals.

 

Anyone wanting some facts, instead of the usual conservative (reform) rhetoric, is quite welcome to take a look at historical data

 

http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/formspubs/t1gnrl/llyrs-eng.html

Message 9 of 10
latest reply

Re: Wynne's "cap and trade" first casualty

Is tha\t when Cretien gutted health care Pierre?

My bad.

 

Message 10 of 10
latest reply