How about just paying decent wages instead?

Wal-Mart asks workers to donate food to its Wal-Mart needy employees...........after making a profit of 15.7 BILLION.

 

http://business.financialpost.com/2013/11/19/wal-mart-food-drive/

 

 





Photobucket
Message 1 of 6
latest reply
5 REPLIES 5

How about just paying decent wages instead?

How much does Walmart have invested in the company ?

 

Considering the risks of business if a company does not make a profit of at least 15% of the investment they are better off closing the company and investing the money in low risk securities.

Message 2 of 6
latest reply

How about just paying decent wages instead?

McDonalds have told their employees to apply for food stamps.
I am surprised that there aren't any unionized Walmarts and McDonalds.
They really need unions.
Message 3 of 6
latest reply

How about just paying decent wages instead?

"they need a union"????

 

WalMart unionized employees in Canada do not think so:

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/08/16/walmart-canada-union-decertifies_n_3769807.html

Message 4 of 6
latest reply

How about just paying decent wages instead?

I know you do not like to talk about numbers yet your initial post is all about numbers.

 

Let's look at them, concentrating on the latest three months results.

 

Sales: $115.6 billions (that is huge)

 

Cost of Sales $ $86.7 billions

 

Expenses (including wages) $22.7 billions

 

Operating income 6.3 billions

 

Interest 0.6 billion

 

Income tax 1.6 billions

 

Net profit after tax $3.7 billions

 

Total assets (capital needed to generate that profit) : 209.9 billions including 78.5 billions in shareholders equity.

 

When you look at the net profit in relation to the capital employed in the business, those billions do not look so big, do they?

 

http://news.walmart.com/news-archive/investors/2013/11/14/walmart-reports-q3-eps-of-114-updates-full...

 

I am not suggesting that WalMart could not pay his employees a bit more.  However, to do that would mean higher prices paid by the consumers to offset those higher costs of doing business.  And we all know many consumers already find prices too high at WalMart!

Message 5 of 6
latest reply

How about just paying decent wages instead?

I am not suggesting that WalMart could not pay his employees a bit more.  However, to do that would mean higher prices paid by the consumers to offset those higher costs of doing business.  And we all know many consumers already find prices too high at WalMart!

 

Wallymart is as we all know, a massive corporation. Many corporations, past and present, have grown and grown for one purpose only, to eliminate competition. This is one of Walmarts doctrines. In the process they have created a huge operating cost at the expense of the employees. Walmart is a tank, crushing everything in it's path and the one reason for it's success are of course the consumer and their greed. Who cares about Frank and Mary's clothing store that were a part of the community and contributed to it for years and employed many people.........as long as someone can save 5 bucks on a shirt so they can buy another CD, all is good. The average consumer are their own worst enemy. Then they go home and wonder where the jobs are, where did all the manufacturing go? Well it went to China and India and Thailand and Taiwan and Mexico etc etc etc because they gave corporations permission to use low wage workers for their profits and for the consumer themselves. It's like watching an animal eating itself and then wondering why it's in so much pain.  





Photobucket
Message 6 of 6
latest reply

Type a product name