And thats what you need to do Hanna. I'm watching the broadcast and they sound like they want to get rid of bad sellers. They can't say Joe is a good seller and Bob is a bad seller, get lost Bob they have to make sweeping changes across the board.
They want the bad sellers exposed and eventually shut down of their own accord. They want the good sellers to shine through and they want sellers to learn what customer service is and to provide it. With good customer service, which means a whole bunch of things including contact, polite contact, and full disclosure of information in terms of listing descriptions, service and shipping.
If you buy new boxes tell them you do. Tell them that you pack really well with bubble wrap, peanuts, securely, properly etc. If you're going to charge standard prices don't ship in an old cereal box sort of thing.
I do find though the lack of negatives & neutrals for buyers interesting. They say that seller retailatory feedback has gone up 8x and it's a problem. I agree it is a problem. But eBay started it, invited it and encouraged it. How? The mutual feedback withdrawl system. It allowed sellers to openly and vindictively neg the buyer then say, hey, want that neg gone? then lets do mutual withdrawl.
It's wrong and totally misuses what the system was for. It was for the presumed good people, buyer or seller, who made a mistake and want to rectify it or the situation was amicably resolved. Not for those who found a cool way to abuse it. Not for sellers who threaten, abuse and retaliate buyers. It also will bounce a lot of sellers into the non-performance category. Some peoples percentages will drop bigtime & get restricted or lose Powerseller status altogether.
I think a lot of this is the fault of the Feedback Mutual Withdrawl system and the people that abused it. It's a shame.
When you find doing what's right hard to do - you've got a problem.