Kat, you read that correct. The package was dropped off on May 17, a Thursday, and the following Monday (which was a holiday), he was asking where it was (it had been in transit for 1 day)
My problem isn't with surface delivery, as I am well aware that it can take a very long time.
The cost of the item purchased was $6. The item cost $75 to ship by surface, and approximately $200 to ship by airmail. The buyer did not want to pay the $200 shipping, so went with the surface option, which we gave him for the $35. Who would pay $200 to have a $6 item shipped? The buyer was given a tracking number (sent parcel post) and an estimated time of delivery (30-40 days). This is a Canada Post estimate, which I realize is not always accurate.
My problem was the way that PayPal has handled this, which is why I had posted originally. I realize that I am probably out of luck, on this, but more needed a place to vent.
PayPal's user agreement states that a buyer cannot start a claim for "item not received" until a reasonable amount of time has passed. In this instance, the buyer was told (and agreed to) 30-40 days, which on the high end would give an estimated delivery date of July 12. This was all detailed in the documentation between myself and the buyer, which PayPal has reviewed.
So if the estimated delivery time is July 12, why would PayPal accept a buyer opening up a claim on May 31, which is 9 days into the 40 day estimate? The dispute was then escalated 20 days later, and PayPal closes the dispute on June 28, which is 30 days into the 40 day estimate.
I am at a loss trying to understand the thinking of the $6 an hour "investigator" working on this...
Thanks for listening.
Peter