05-26-2014 04:23 PM
.......................... alledged breach of trust, fraud under $5,000 and uttering forged documents.
Surprised? Should we be? A former Liberal cabinet minister under Jean Chretien.
It's just $1,700, but what's at issue at the trial of London's mayor is what the money was really for.
The Crown says London Mayor Joe Fontana doctored a Marconi Club wedding reception contract in 2005 with the intention of skimming $1,700 from the federal government.
Not so fast, says Fontana's defence team, who are hinting that there was a legitimate purpose for the money that was reimbursed to the then-federal cabinet minister and wholly unrelated to the nuptials.
The numbers and the documents are piling up at Fontana's widely anticipated Superior Court trial that began Monday morning.
Fontana, 64, who was a federal cabinet minister at the time of the wedding, said he was “confident' when he arrived at the London courthouse. He pleaded not guilty to three charges: Breach of trust by a public official, fraud and uttering forged documents.
Not long later, Fontana's lawyer, Gordon Cudmore, told Justice Bruce Thomas that his client admits to doctoring the personal contract document with the Marconi Club signed in October 2004 for his son's wedding and submitting it for payment with the House of Commons comptroller.
Cudmore admitted that not only was the date changed, the purpose was changed from “wedding” to “reception” and the original signature by his wife, Vicky, was covered over and then signed by Fontana himself.
Also added, Cudmore said, was the word “original”.
Assistant Crown attorney Tim Zuber said in his opening statement that five months after the Fontanas booked the wedding reception, the doctored document landed on the desk of Fontana's assistant on Parliament Hill, Kristy Cairns.
A yellow sticky note was attached to the paper in Fontana's handwriting directing: “Please submit miscellaneous constituents reception.”
The cheque was cut by the government and was sent to the Marconi Club. The payment by government cheque showed up on the final invoice for the wedding.
The court heard from Marconi Club former general manager Joe DiPietro, who identified the documents and described the routine of booking parties and weddings.
The Fontanas made their $1,700 deposit in October 2004 for the wedding in June 2005 – the deposit was in the ledger - and signed the contract with the number 2661.
When the final bill was drawn up, the Government of Canada cheque for $1,700 was included in the payment of the wedding that cost $18,900.
But DiPietro was foggy on details. He had no independent recollection that the cheque was for the wedding or any conversation with club president Vince Trovado about what the money was really for. The court also heard from Cairns, who confirmed she sent the invoice with a form letter from Fontana's House of Common's office.
The letter asked that the expenses be paid back to Fontana directly.
She agreed in cross-examination by defence lawyer Jim Dean that in March 2005, when the doctored contract was submitted, there was a government budget crunch and that there was pressure to submit all bills before the end of the fiscal year.
Monday afternoon, the Crown will play a video of Fontana's interview with the RCMP in the fall of 2012.
http://www.lfpress.com/2014/05/26/london-mayor-joe-fontanas-fraud-trial-begins
05-26-2014 07:37 PM
Another liberal in trouble with the law?
Say it isn't so Justin.
At least he is pro-choice eh?
05-27-2014 01:00 AM
This has nothing to do with Fontana being a Liberal. This is who he is and always was from his childhood. His father was a cop and Joe thought he could get away with anything and he did. He felt invincible along the same degree as the Ford brothers.
I wouldn't say Mulroney and his envelope of money, or Harper's friends in the Senate are who they are because they are Conservatives. Who they all are is just plain common people taking advantage wherever they can. Many people of all races, creeds, colours and political persuasions will do the same things if given half the chance and think they can get a way with it.
Gord Cudmore is one of the best lawyers in London and he has an ace up his sleeve, he just wanted the testimony today to be concluded so he would know what to put forward tomorrow or the next day. Will Fontana get off? Hard to say, without knowing what Cudmore has in waiting. But even if he is convicted, it will be a fine and a severe slap on the wrist for the measly sum of 1700.00 dollars. He didn't rob a bank with a gun or steal an old lady's purse and with his background of no criminal convictions, plus he probably has a bus load of people to vouch for all the good things he has done. Also it's the same judge who worked the trial for Tim Best and he got only a 5 1/2 month sentence for drunk driving, causing two accidents and fleeing two accidents and then avoiding police. The judge can see right through Fontana but Cudmore also has a lot of respect in the judicial world.
Fontana has a lot of supporters in London despite his recent track record as mayor. He also has a lot of enemies out for blood, either because they dislike him as mayor, or they just like a good political hanging of sorts. But if Fontana gets off and isn't convicted he's going to really enjoy rubbing people's noses in his victory. Whatever way it turns out, someone is not going to be happy.
Now it's just a matter or waiting.
05-27-2014 09:04 AM
Here's another Liberal referred to as a bozo.
A Liberal MP was secretly recorded saying that he thought party leader Justin Trudeau had a “bozo eruption” when he declared that anti-abortion candidates won’t be allowed to run for the Liberals.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/bozo-eruption-liberal-mp-secretly-recorded-slamming-trudeau-s-abortio...
05-27-2014 09:08 AM
05-27-2014 09:18 AM
I think most Canadians (regardless of political affiliation) agree that only a "bozo" could have appointed Brazeau, Duffy and Wallin to the Senate. Only a "bozo" could try to pick a fight with the Chief of the Supreme Court.
Who is that "bozo"? What should we do with him?
05-27-2014 10:19 AM
05-27-2014 10:35 AM
You found him... You found the "bozo".
05-27-2014 11:05 AM
05-27-2014 11:17 AM
Only a Bozo would agree to sell off oil to a Communist government with an atrocious human rights track record. Canada use to stand for something, but not anymore.
You don't stay in power for 8 years already and be a bozo!
Really? Hitler was in power longer. Anyone can stay in power if they are secretive, underhanded, manipulative and they have a group of fanatics supporting them.
05-27-2014 02:30 PM
Valve, I have noticed that your threads are all political in nature, and involve some wrong doings of some member of a Liberal party whether federal or provincial. I am going out in nature later today and listen to birds tweet. From many observations over the years, I feel that political obsessions are unhealthy, and a little distressing to witness and the birds are pleasant by contrast. Or are you actually working with a competing party, and the posts are part of your obligations to that allegiance, and not from habitual following of news/talk media? What I mainly mean is that some relaxing is good for the spirit.
05-27-2014 03:49 PM
I love relaxing in the wild and listening to the birds as well. In fact I like calling them into my decoys, quack quack. Nothing more exciting than a **bleep** pheasant exploding from cover and taking him at the top of his rise. Unfortunately my pointer is gone over the rainbow now but here's a pic of her when she was at her best.
By the way I am a bit of a political junky.
05-28-2014 05:04 PM
owlgebra it's called venting.
valve is fed up with crooked poiticians and the liberals in particular.
05-28-2014 09:27 PM
@prior-of-verity*shake-hands-with-your-devil wrote:Only a Bozo would agree to sell off oil to a Communist government with an atrocious human rights track record. Canada use to stand for something, but not anymore.
You don't stay in power for 8 years already and be a bozo!
Really? Hitler was in power longer. Anyone can stay in power if they are secretive, underhanded, manipulative and they have a group of fanatics supporting them.
How is this different than trading with Cuba ?
05-28-2014 10:50 PM
@prior-of-verity*shake-hands-with-your-devil wrote:Only a Bozo would agree to sell off oil to a Communist government with an atrocious human rights track record. Canada use to stand for something, but not anymore.
You don't stay in power for 8 years already and be a bozo!
Really? Hitler was in power longer. Anyone can stay in power if they are secretive, underhanded, manipulative and they have a group of fanatics supporting them.
How is trading with China any worse than trading with Cuba ?
Both have the same human rights, or lack thereof.
05-29-2014 12:53 AM
To understand Cuba, you have to know it's history. The foundation of all of Cuba's problems stems back a long time before Castro and the problem was the continual interference by the USA. When Castro took power he was not a Communist and even imprisoned Communists who had supported the tyrannical President Batista. However with the loss of Batista American corporations and even the mafia who controlled resorts and gambling and prostitution were not happy. That influence the US government to do something about it as they had done in other areas of Latin America in the past. Castro knew he did not have a chance against a US force so he had to align himself with someone else powerful for not only protection but commerce so his island and people had some sort of trade. He chose Russia. Technically Cuba was like the little kid on the block who was constantly pushed around and his lunch money stolen. In the case of Cuba, it was government control through Batista and a majority of Cuban land and livestock was taken/owned by US interests. So the little kid (Cuba) found another big kid to stand up for him.
China on the other hand, freely chose it's Communist state.
Does any of this justify the human rights violations in Cuba? Not at all. However it does explain why it happened.
Obama has been working on better relations with Cuba and although Cuba is softening some representatives of the Republican party have no interest in making relations better.
05-29-2014 08:29 AM
"How is this different than trading with Cuba ?"
???
Canada trades with Cuba and with China.
Nothing wrong with that, is there?
USA does not trade with Cuba (at least not officially) and, back in the 1970's, did not trade with the People's Republic of China. Instead USA recognized Formosa (Taiwan) as "China" and only traded with businesses on the island. Eventually USA understood money was to be made dealing with the real China (the Communists) and the rest, as they say, is history. Americans go where the money is, regardless of social or moral values.
05-30-2014 12:10 AM
Eventually USA understood money was to be made dealing with the real China (the Communists) and the rest, as they say, is history. Americans go where the money is, regardless of social or moral values.
The founding fathers of the US are crying in their graves. We should be ashamed as well. When did we sell off our integrity and our conscience? Oh yeah, it was when our own little dictator decided it was time to sell off.
05-30-2014 04:43 PM
Americans go where the money is, regardless of social or moral values.
As do Canadians.