10-19-2013 09:08 AM - edited 10-19-2013 09:11 AM
I bought an item for $600 and it didn't arrive. It was shipped with tracking of sorts and showed as being lost at the border.
Very Odd.
The seller made me wait 45 days for a refund but about a weak ago she refunded and I completed the insurance form.
She must have received her refund a few days ago.
I just saw that the item is listed again under a different seller's name.
This 100% guaranteed the same item.
No doubt.
Man............ what a scam.
I called shipsurance but it's Saturday and still early in California.
I wonder if they can recover their money?
11-06-2013 08:32 AM
That's possible…………..
However, the item was shipped by an experienced seller and she didn't cut corners when packaging this expensive item.
The other oddity is that it was posted back on eBay in such a short period of time.
I believe the rule of thumb is to keep items for 7 months before putting them into a postal auction.
My item was already listed for re-sale in well under 2 months.
For it to get from the PO back to eBay in that short amount of time means they didn't hold it at all.
(BTW……….: What happened to the spell check?)
11-06-2013 09:41 AM
@i*m-still-here wrote:
However, the item was shipped by an experienced seller and she didn't cut corners when packaging this expensive item.
How can you determine that without having seen her packaging job?
11-06-2013 10:38 AM
Logic.
11-06-2013 10:39 AM
.............. and communication.
11-06-2013 07:29 PM
@i*m-still-here wrote:.............. and communication.
Many people think they pack well when in fact they pack items very poorly.
11-07-2013 01:09 AM
I'm really sorry to hear about your loss. Please accept my condolences.
11-07-2013 07:14 AM
@pjcdn2005 wrote:I'm really sorry to hear about your loss. Please accept my condolences.
PJ, that is very kind of you.
Thank You very much for the message.
11-07-2013 07:24 AM - edited 11-07-2013 07:24 AM
I don't believe it was packed portly. This experienced seller with her own web-site told me she shipped in a box. In many many years of buying I've received only one item that had slipped from the packaging.
Even so………… if it had slipped from the package ……….. wouldn't they hold the item for 7 months?
They should have had both the item and the package but not together, and they should have held them for some time.
If it was in fact bought at an auction as the second seller told me it was, then the PO shot it out the door almost on the day it arrived.
Also, there is no damage tot he piece other than what was reported in the original listing and so it was well cared for along the line.
Once I get grounded again I'l call the PO once more, but I expect a dead end.
11-07-2013 09:15 AM
The price from the original seller (in USA) was $600.
What was the price you paid for the same item from the second seller (in Ontario)?
12-13-2013 07:46 PM
Just want to say: You might see me on W-5 yet. If I had more time I'd be very tempted to contact them.
I just had the report from the Ombudsman on this.
There was a long detailed report and I have to say that a lot of time was taken to put it together.
However, the report consisted of a very detailed account of the events as I reported them in addition to a list of all the phone calls and traces conducted by me and the seller.
There was no investigation whatsoever.
I have the feeling that the whole process was a lot like when the police investigate the police.
For an investigation to be meaningful they should have determined if the item actually went auction.
Not that complicated. Auction Houses document all their items and would have a receipt of the sale if is was in fact sold at auction.
12-13-2013 08:30 PM
@i*m-still-here wrote:
I just had the report from the Ombudsman on this.
Which Ombudsman?
12-13-2013 10:05 PM
Which ombudsman?
I didn't know I had a choice.
12-14-2013 01:15 AM
You don't even know what organization your Ombudsman works for?
12-14-2013 08:33 AM
Of Course I know, but when you ask which ombudsman your question implies that I can choose which organization to complain to.
I didn't know I had a choice..... :).
12-14-2013 12:17 PM
The price from the original seller (in USA) was $600.
What was the price you paid for the same item from the second seller (in Ontario)?
12-14-2013 01:18 PM
Less.
Are you asking because you're wondering if I got a break?
I did, but I would much rather have had the item arrive the first time around.
12-14-2013 01:40 PM
Thing is, I received a very detailed report and I can see that they put a lot of time into it.
The report consists of my emails to them and my phone calls. They must have recorded the calls because the report is very accurate.
In addition to that they also transcribed a record of all the traces we conducted.
To that they added nothing.
There was no investigation.
It wouldn't have taken much to contact the auction house where they release CPO items to see if it was sold at auction.
Auction houses catalogue everything and they would have a receipt for the sale as well.
They didn't even bother to do that and it would have taken about 15 minutes of their time and yielded some real answers.
It's almost like they didn't want to know.
If it wasn't sold at the CPO auction like the second seller said it was, then that points to theft.
If it was sold at auction then there is clearly a problem at the CPO because it would have been released for auction within a week and not seven months as they claim.
Just like when the police investigate the police.
12-15-2013 09:50 AM - edited 12-15-2013 09:51 AM
From Canada Post 2012 Annual Report:
12-15-2013 10:44 AM
Pierre, I read your post but I'm not sure what your point is for posting it.
In my case they did an investigation, or that's what they called it.
It's clear that they put a lot of time into it.
My point is that the investigation is a farce.
What they are calling an investigation in my case is simply a rehashing of events.
12-16-2013 12:24 PM
I just received an email telling me that they've re-opened the case because I complained.
On the one hand I'm tired of it and wish I'd just walked away because I don't want to cause trouble.
On the other hand I don't understand why they didn't do the obvious the first time around instead of just rehashing the sequence of events to me.
That is: Was the item released to an auction house by the CPO and sold at auction or not?
That's the only thing that matters and the only thing they didn't bother to check out.